![]() ![]() "Generally speaking, you can't open yourself up to attack as someone who's conflicted or someone who's got a financial stake in the game. In some cases, though, it may be better for them not to opine on certain topics - like whether or not Americans will need a booster, since Pfizer has a clear stake in that question," Caplan said. In addition, any spokesperson or representative of any company is always required to be transparent and disclose their connections - especially in public settings - as a conflict of interest. in the ICU's, and then see what happens when you vaccinate," he said. "You just have to look at the morgue, and you have to look. They're suggesting all the time that they're buying influence to promote vaccines," Caplan said.īut the data speaks for itself, especially for vaccines, removing any need to buy an advocate, Caplan said. Their biggest target is pharma, their second biggest target is biotech. "All anti-vaxxers are on the lookout for anything that can compromise the credibility of people who speak for science. Scott Gottlieb, who sits on Pfizer's ( PFE) board, has been an easy target. In particular, former FDA Commissioner Dr. "If people were to be asked today who their scientist experts are, I think they might start talking about Fox News, or a celebrity, or someone who is prominent in the anti-vaccine (anti-vax) movement, because they see them a lot on social media," Caplan said.īeyond looking for sources that help cast doubt about vaccines and science, anti-vaxxers also look for information that makes it easy to create mistrust. Most of what I see on Fox (News) opinion is just wrong," Caplan said.Ĭaplan told Yahoo Finance that the traditional routes of scientists speaking at a press conference or in interviews to reporters who specialize in science and health coverage used to be the proper way to get accurate information out. Science has to do better in terms of getting its voice heard…and we have to call out false information. ![]() “Social media has overwhelmed the old way of getting information out. The truth is misinformation takes away our freedom to make informed decisions," Murthy said. And while it often appears innocuous on social media apps, and retail sites for search engines. "Today we live in a world where misinformation poses an imminent and insidious threat to our nation's health. Murthy, at a press conference with Press Secretary Jen Psaki, said the spread of misinformation throughout the pandemic has cost unnecessary loss of life and infections. Hotez says he has for years been sounding the alarm, only to be told by government agencies that addressing the movement would " give them a platform and oxygen." "This is now an empire that dominates not only social media but the internet, video platforms, cable news networks, really all forms of human interaction," he added. health) agencies over the past few years," Hotez said. "The failing of the document is it does not acknowledge the depth and breadth of the misinformation empire which has been enabled in part by the silence of the (U.S. Peter Hotez, dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine, told Yahoo Finance the advisory is too basic for a complex problem that has been festering for years. ![]() Limiting the spread of health misinformation is a moral and civic imperative that will require a whole-of-society effort," he said. ![]() It can cause confusion, sow mistrust, harm people’s health, and undermine public health efforts. Health misinformation is a serious threat to public health. "I am urging all Americans to help slow the spread of health misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. Vivek Murthy releasing an advisory last week hoping to "raise the bar for sharing health information by checking sources before sharing." Fighting misinformation is now a focus of the U.S. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |